We received an invitation to a free-dinner-talk, sent from what we thought was the local fire department. Turns out, it was a guy trying to sell us smoke alarms.
Sitting through the somewhat dreadful dinner of pulled pork, beans, and coleslaw, I whispered to Jim, “Bet it costs $5000 to put smoke alarms in the house.” And sure enough, the cost, as we learned on a subsequent evening, was $4900.
For smoke alarms? Really?
Now we already have wired-in smoke alarms in the house. They were here in 2000 when we moved in and, other than change the batteries, we’ve done nothing to them. But. What we learned the night of the dinner was this: our smoke alarms operate via ionization, detecting electrically charged particles. According to the salesman at the dinner, these fail in 55 percent of house fires.
Instead, the salesman showed us photoelectric devices, which detect smoke via a beam of light. He suggested we buy 6 photoelectric devices, together with alarms for the kitchen and attic that measure rate of rise in heat—when the kitchen temperature rises more than 15 degrees in less than a minute, an alarm sounds. Plus two fire extinguishers. Plus a fire blanket. All installed in the house for $4900.
Long story short, Amazon sells a variety of photoelectric smoke alarms for $35-$65. We bought four of the $35 variety, installed them ourselves. Cost? Less than $200. We can purchase the rest of the equipment for about another $200.
Total? $400. Of course, we have to install everything ourselves (thank you, Jim) and our products are made in Mexico rather than California. But is the supposed quality difference worth $4500?
2 thoughts on “What Things Cost: Fire Alarms”
Did the $4900 system include alerts to the local fire department?
The guy was right about the ionization-only alarms — a dual ionization/photoelectric alarm is much better. And the alarms themselves do have to be replaced every seven years, especially the carbon monoxide ones.
Around here, they offer the alarm systems for free but ding you on the monthly monitoring charges. This guy’s approach seems to be the complete opposite.
The cost of the system did not include local monitoring, which we didn’t want and probably can’t have. I can’t imagine that the local fire department offers that kind of service. That’s the difference between urban NJ and rural KS. I haven’t seen dual ionization/photoelectric alarms. Interesting that the alarms need replacing every seven years since our guy tried to sell us devices with twenty-year batteries (although the notice on the device itself said the batteries were good for ten years).